![]() By Doug Crowell - Blockhouse Investigations - Nova Scotia, Canada In an Extended White Paper sent to David Tobias, of Triton Alliance, from Doctor Mark Schmalz and Doctor Gerhard Ritter, dated January 12th 1995 and entitled "Image Enhancement and Data Analysis in support of Archaeological Field Studies" we have found some very interesting information to relate to you regarding Oak Island and, in particular, the 10X Cavity. The two doctors worked together at the Center for Computer Vision and Visualization at the University of Florida in Gainesville Florida. The white paper summarized their "proposed work in image processing and data/technology characterization, in support of Triton's efforts in the Mahone Bay area", as was discussed with David Tobias and Bob Atkinson. It was quite a comprehensive proposal regarding the image enhancement of various film and photos taken on the island, as you can see from the Table of Contents from this proposal (shown below). The image enhancement techniques they used and the science behind those techniques were documented in great detail in their 66 page proposal, of which this excerpt is just a small sample (see image below). Did you catch that first sentence in the Proposal excerpt above? It reads, "Based upon our previous experience with Triton-furnished imagery". Previous experience. So this proposal was submitted as a plan to perform further work for the former treasure hunting company. Does that make you wonder what Oak Island photos or film they had previously worked on enhancing? It sure did for us. Efforts to contact Dr. Schmalz have not received a reply as of yet, but we did discover images from the 10X cavity that they had enhanced. These were found in the late Paul Wroclawski's Oak Island research collection. They were included in a 2007 PowerPoint presentation created by Oak Island researcher and author Les MacPhie, who told me they were gifted to him by David Tobias. We are grateful for Les MacPhie's permission to reproduce them here. These are the clearest images we have seen yet of the contents of the 10X cavity. Doctors Schmalz and Ritter performed some impressive image enhancement on the blurry images most of us have seen in the past. It is unfortunate that Triton does not seem to have taken them up on their proposal for further work in this area. It would have been really interesting to see what they could have done with images of the rest of the cavity. So what do you think after seeing these images? Is it an actual chest? Goodnight from The Blockhouse!
30 Comments
Randal Taylor
4/13/2016 01:37:14 pm
Great findings. As usual when I come here I expect to see solid evidence...you fail to disappoint me :)
Reply
Carolyn Prest
4/13/2016 01:47:05 pm
Great find and great work! Thanks for sharing.
Reply
Tom Moeding
4/13/2016 02:11:35 pm
Looks like it could be a chest with layers of silt on it. If it's been there for hundreds of years you could expect silt to settle on it.
Reply
Jim
4/13/2016 03:18:30 pm
The pole could well be from a loading pole lost down the hole. A pole used for loading explosives.
Reply
Ron
4/13/2016 03:25:24 pm
Ongoing mystery crap. You are as bad as the rest perpetuating this by continuously rehashing the same stuff over and over. Too frightened to publish all the evidence ( like the newspapers from the time that just say it) they were using a copy of a spanish treasure map everyone had in the 19th century or do you have some finasncial interest going in this?
Reply
Doug Crowell
4/13/2016 03:42:13 pm
Welcome back Ron. I almost missed your sour and demeaning disposition. How you equate presenting little seen historical evidence and facts to rehashing crap is beyond my understanding. We make zero revenue off of this site, it simply represents our wish to provide facts to those interested. As I said before, point me to your theory and I will take a look at what you feel is the truth.
Reply
Gary
4/13/2016 06:45:33 pm
Ron sounds like a giant douche Doug!
Reply
Doug Crowell
4/13/2016 07:30:52 pm
i think Ron is very resolute in his belief in the "every treasure map is the same map" theory, which I am aware has been around for many decades, but I am not very knowledgable about yet. His impatience in waiting for the rest of us to see the truth seems to manifest itself in a less than personable manner. I fully intend to study that theory though after we wrap up some of our other lines of investigation.
Mike Morgan
4/13/2016 03:52:14 pm
Given that any images from 10X were taken post dynamiting, the chances that it is anything other than rocks and/or debris, are approaching absolute zero.
Reply
Doug Crowell
4/13/2016 07:44:29 pm
Thanks Mike. Our mandate will always be to bring the facts to the table and to look at what those facts suggest, but I think there is value in the occasional guest article. Especially those articles that present the background elements, or overview, of popular theories, giving the readers a chance to understand what a given theory is proposing, Armed with a knowledge of the basic premise of a theory, and the known facts about Oak Island, people can better decide for themselves what they believe or don't believe. Thanks for reading!
Reply
John Frick
4/13/2016 10:29:08 pm
I talked in private with one of the on island searchers about this, and even after reading the Wonnacott article, they still feel just as strongly at that there are things in 10x. IMO there is 100% likely to be very old things in 10-x, but then I have seen way more than most.
Reply
John Frick
4/13/2016 10:32:25 pm
So its an opinion that it is approaching zero because I and on island searchers have it at a flat 100% likelihood. Also an opinion, but a much much better informed opinion. Especially as they have seen the full video of all the recent filmings of what is down there. Just the little 5 second piece that they leaked into the show has me totally convinced.
Peter Geuzen
4/13/2016 04:48:53 pm
Obvious Answer #1 - It's the head of Hercules wearing an animal skin headdress, part of a larger life size statue that's been there for two thousand years, proving the Roman theory and clearly being a matching artifact confirmation to the Roman Sword. See linked pic:
Reply
Peter Geuzen
4/13/2016 04:49:24 pm
Obvious Answer #1 - It's the head of Hercules wearing an animal skin headdress, part of a larger life size statue that's been there for two thousand years, proving the Roman theory and clearly being a matching artifact confirmation to the Roman Sword. See linked pic:
Reply
Peter Geuzen
4/13/2016 04:49:51 pm
Obvious Answer #1 - It's the head of Hercules wearing an animal skin headdress, part of a larger life size statue that's been there for two thousand years, proving the Roman theory and clearly being a matching artifact confirmation to the Roman Sword. See linked pic:
Reply
Peter Geuzen
4/13/2016 04:50:27 pm
Obvious Answer #1 - It's the head of Hercules wearing an animal skin headdress, part of a larger life size statue that's been there for two thousand years, proving the Roman theory and clearly being a matching artifact confirmation to the Roman Sword. See linked pic:
Reply
Peter Geuzen
4/14/2016 06:30:47 am
I got four consecutive error messages when trying to post last night, so I gave up. I see this morning it actually posted four times. Sorry about that - please feel free to delete the extras, if you can.
Reply
Blaine Schooley
4/13/2016 05:31:03 pm
I love reading about this and all the info you guys keep putting up. Keep up the good work!
Reply
John Frick
4/13/2016 10:33:39 pm
Keep it coming with the pro-10x stuff. In the long run it will play out that things were down there all along.
Reply
Glen
4/14/2016 07:10:18 am
I wonder how many times someone will go down that shaft as ten or twelve already have, find nothing...any yet gullible minds will still believe and 'know' there is treasure there...I'd rate that as 100% probable
Reply
Mark Ellis
4/14/2016 09:25:30 am
Another good and interesting read. With the conflicting results between the sonar, ROV, photos, people that have been in the cavity, etc, hopefully someday they find out definitely about what is and/or isn't in there and also the who's, the why's and the how's if something is there. For me hard to resolve, I look at something as a possibility but then when looking at it from another angle, it conflicts with that possibility. Oh well, that is Oak Island for ya!
Reply
Peter Geuzen
4/15/2016 06:58:56 pm
There are a couple key problems with interpreting these pics. Firstly, it is basically just one picture but in two views (with an assumed piece of wood in one view for some unknown reason), without any larger context within a larger setting and no other view from any other angle to help explain it. Secondly, we have no idea of scale. Is this corner of whatever it is, a couple centimetres long, or a couple metres long? These points in combination add up to the biggest problem; this is not a picture of an object in it's entirety - we are not seeing the whole object therefore it's impossible to suggest much of anything other than what logic dictates. Key question - what are the details on the accompanying sketches; who did these and for what purpose; are these from Les?
Reply
Doug Crowell
4/16/2016 11:26:17 am
Hi Peter. I am working getting an answer for your last question. You are correct about scale. No way to know from those photos, unless some people are correct about what the pole is, then we could estimate the scale.
Reply
Doug Crowell
4/16/2016 04:08:37 pm
Peter, the drawings came with the photos, so it is assumed they were made by Schmalz.
Reply
Peter Geuzen
4/17/2016 08:15:49 am
I think this confirms something, to me at least. In the final episode of Drilling Down when Brian Abbott is trying to explain his sonar interpretation from previously in the season he mentions having seen clear crisp images of 10x in a report shown to him while on the island. He doesn't identify who showed them to him but he says he could see boarding, a lock, and a curved top - all the things supposedly visible in the pictures in this post (as influenced by the suggestions in the accompanying sketches of course), thus I assume exactly the same pictures (he later notes them to be 8x10 and in a well done report). The Laginas and Dave B act surprised and unknowing of what these pictures are. If you listen really closely, Brian says over his shoulder towards the Laginas sitting behind him: "...that Les got from someplace...." - he says it really quickly and its tricky to hear "Les". He then says, referring to the source of the pictures "I don't know the gentleman's name but he's an engineer out of Montreal". Marty replies "Must be Pete". It's not clear if Brian means this was the person showing him the pictures or the original source of the pictures/report. The possibility is that he is really referring to Tobias, not 'Pete' who is presumably a more recent player because the other guys all seemed to nod/chime in and agree when Marty said 'Pete'.
Glen
4/17/2016 07:15:22 am
The "pole" is obviously proof that Hector Barbossa, the peglegged pirate captain of the Black Pearl, was in the cavern burying a treasure chest when overcome from lack of oxygen, and now only his skeleton, pegleg, and treasure chest are left in the silt. The pegleg floating around is undeniable proof of this...and when they explore the cavern I bet they will also find the skeleton and feathers from his only friend, Polly Parrot...
Reply
Peter Geuzen
4/27/2016 07:31:04 pm
Another good question. Speculatively, maybe there was a piece of wood hung below the camera but on the same line of sight as the lens so that any deflection in the 'pointer' that showed in any given picture would indicate water current action or direction, away from the point of focus. Given that it shows and disappears in these two similar pics might mean it was being affected by current (maybe even spinning).
Reply
Susan Lavalle
5/3/2016 01:22:47 pm
Did anyone besides me see carving and chisel marks on the second picture. There appears to be at least two "X" on it.
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
From The Blockhouse
is published by Blockhouse Investigations and oakislandcompendium.ca in Nova Scotia, Canada Editors and Chief Correspondents Kelly W. Hancock, CD Doug Crowell Writers Jonathan Guy Contributing Writers John Wonnacott, P. Eng. Les MacPhie,P.Eng. Researchers Linda Rafuse Tammy Sloan Trevor McFetridge Consultants Alessandra Nadudvari Shawna Goodall Webmaster Jonathan Guy All material and images published herein, unless otherwise credited, are copyright of Blockhouse Investigations and oakislandcompendium.ca and may be reproduced by permission only. Views expressed in these blog posts are our own. The views of those that comment are their own. Archives
November 2017
Categories |